| Main purpose | A decision workspace built for one job: judging whether a startup idea deserves your next weeks. | A general assistant for brainstorming, research, writing, files, images, code and broader personal or work tasks. |
|---|
| How an idea is evaluated | Clarifying questions first, then the same ten commercial signals applied to every idea. | Open conversation, often research-led. The evaluation method is whatever you specify in the prompt. |
|---|
| Consistency across multiple ideas | Every idea runs through the identical framework, so scores are comparable side by side. | Possible with a carefully designed prompt reused across ideas, tracked by you. |
|---|
| Decision output | One score and one outcome: Build, Explore or Skip, with a stated next step. | A written answer shaped by your request rather than a fixed decision scale. |
|---|
| Assumptions and weak points | Assumptions, risks and a confidence level are named per signal, and the weakest signal is flagged. | Will raise them when prompted. Applying that uniformly to every idea is your own process. |
|---|
| Validation guidance | A validation checklist and a single recommended next action ship with every score. | Can suggest research and tests, especially where public information helps. |
|---|
| Saved idea portfolio | Ideas are saved as a portfolio you can rank and revisit as they change. | Chat history helps you find past work. Comparable idea scores are not what it is for. |
|---|
| Strategy and execution outputs | Marketing, sales, finance and tech outputs plus a full execution plan. | Can draft plans and documents, and fits neatly into Google-based workflows. |
|---|
| Build-ready handoff | A build-ready prompt written for whatever builder you already use. | Can produce specs and code from your description. |
|---|
| Best fit | Founders and builders who need a repeatable method for choosing between ideas. | Anyone wanting a broad assistant close to their existing Google workflow. |
|---|